You Shall Not Pass: The Legal Action is Brought
What anguish...the complaint alleged
I am on vacation. My son has referred to me as “savage” in monopoly. I’m Thus sharing this satire content to buy me some time for free to you, my dear readers. Enjoy! Yes, it’s LOTR parody fiction.
Introduction
The Law Firm of Elrond and Associates, Elves at Law, representing the Balrog, a fellow Maia (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff"), files this civil legal claim for damages against Gandalf the Grey (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant"). Plaintiff asserts that Defendant made a harmful and discriminatory statement, specifically, "You shall not pass," during an encounter in the Mines of Moria. Plaintiff contends that this statement was made with the intention to harm Plaintiff's reputation.
II. Statement of Facts
Plaintiff, a powerful Maia entity, encountered Defendant, a prominent wizard, during a confrontation in the Mines of Moria. At this encounter, Defendant made the statement "You shall not pass" to Plaintiff, in the presence of several witnesses, including members of the Fellowship of the Ring. Plaintiff claims that this statement was not only false but also harmful to their reputation, causing significant distress and damage.
III. Legal Claim
Plaintiff brings this legal claim for damages on the basis of defamation, alleging that Defendant's statement was false, harmful, and discriminatory, and made with the intent to harm Plaintiff's reputation.
A. Elements of Defamation
To establish a claim for defamation, Plaintiff must demonstrate the following elements:
A false and defamatory statement concerning the Plaintiff;
An unprivileged publication to a third party;
Fault amounting to at least negligence on the part of Defendant; and
Damages as a result of the statement.
B. Plaintiff's Arguments
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's statement "You shall not pass" is false and defamatory, as it portrays Plaintiff as an insurmountable obstacle, thereby harming Plaintiff's reputation among the inhabitants of Middle-earth. Furthermore, Plaintiff contends that Defendant's statement was published to a third party, specifically, the members of the Fellowship of the Ring who were present during the encounter in Moria, and published by known Hobbit Journalists, including family members of known author of “There And Back Again”, and thus there was expectation that all statements would be made public.
Defendant further contends that The Fellowship of the Ring Movie Adaptation by Director Peter Jackson was re-publication to a new audience, and thus this resets any stature of limitations that might be alleged to limit bringing this matter.
Plaintiff also asserts that Defendant was at least negligent, if not malicious, in making this statement, as it was intended to cause harm to Plaintiff's reputation. Plaintiff is a reputable Maia and his ongoing efforts to restore safe passage and mining operations in the Mines of Moria makes this particular statement particularly galling, false, misleading, and lead to damage.
Finally, Plaintiff claims to have suffered damages as a result of Defendant's statement, including emotional distress and damage to their reputation among fellow Maia and the inhabitants of Middle-earth.
IV. Prayer for Relief
Plaintiff seeks damages for the harm caused by Defendant's defamatory statement, including but not limited to:
Compensatory damages for harm to Plaintiff's reputation;
Damages for significant emotional distress suffered by Plaintiff as a result of the defamatory statement; and
Any further relief that the court deems appropriate.
V. Conclusion
Elrond and Associates, Elves at Law, on behalf of Plaintiff, respectfully request that the court recognize the harm caused by Defendant's defamatory statement and award damages accordingly. This case underscores the importance of holding individuals accountable for harmful and discriminatory statements that damage the reputations and well-being of others.